JavaScript está desactivado. Para una mejor experiencia, por favor active JavaScript en su navegador antes de continuar.

CPUs intel pierden hasta un 35% de rendimiento al aplicar parche de seguridad.

Wardenclyffe☄️ · 2022-03-12T17:48:55+00:00

Intel's Mitigations For New Spectre V2 Exploit Affect CPU Performance, Up To 35% Drop Intel’s Mitigations For New Spectre V2 Exploit Affect CPU Performance, Up To 35% Drop By Jason R. Wilson Mar 12, 2022 02:38 EST SHARE TWEET SUBMIT Branch History Injection (BHI), a new variant of the Spectre V2 vulnerability affecting several Intel processors and a handful of Arm cores, was announced earlier this week by VUSec, the Systems and Network Security Group at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Linux site Phoronix performed tests showing a 35% drop in performance on the affected processors by the new BHI mitigations. Intel CPUs show a 35% decrease in performance from the effects of the BHI-variant of Spectre V2 Intel plans to release a security update for the company's affected processors but will take longer to produce due to the number of attacked processors. Readers will remember earlier this week that the Intel processors from the Haskell series are the most vulnerable of the company's chips. The Linux community has already initiated the mitigation to fix the affected CPUs on their operating system. It was very shortly after the announcement of the exploit that an update was already in effect. VUSec advises enabling Repotlines (return and trampoline) to mitigate the BHI. The recommendation includes current processors equipped with the critical Spectre V2 hardware mitigations. For Intel, this would be the eIBRS (Enhanced Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation) and the additional Retpolines working parallel to each other due to eIBRS not being sufficient to fight off BHI. As indicated by Phoronix's Intel's Core i9-12900K results, systems administration and capacity execution declined upon activating Retpolines. The test results describe a 26.7% loss in performance on the previous and 14.5% on the other. That is the sign of these mitigations: Any outer I/O from the chip endures a significant after effect. GIMP processes, such as image manipulation and Internet browsing, did not show negligible effects. Intel Core i9-12900K eibrs,retpoline comparison (Image Credits: Phoronix) The Core i7-1185G7 (Tiger Lake) took a significantly more hard hit to capacity performance. The outcomes showed 35.6% in the OSBench test and 34.1% lower execution in the Flexible IO Tester. Once again, processes that don't depend on I/O or systems administration do not show critical execution loss. These incorporate gaming, internet perusing, and other day-to-day assignments. Intel Core i7-1185G7 eibrs,retpoline comparison (Image Credits: Phoronix) Phoronix noticed that AMD processors are not protected from BHI even though advanced Zen chips now influence Retpolines. The issue is that AMD's LFENCE/JMP-based execution of Retpolines isn't sufficient to battle off BHI, so the chipmaker is moving to standard Retpolines. The effect of the change for AMD processors is obscure, yet Phoronix is directing new tests to discover if there are any effects. It's conceivable Intel and other programming engineers will want to diminish the effect of the BHI alleviations with extra time and exertion. However, for the present, empowering the patches could demonstrate extremely difficult on servers, and different frameworks that do a ton of I/O escalated work. @Billy Fockabocas , disfrutalo